Pratt & Whitney’s new PurePower Geared Turbofan aircraft engines
are impressive beasts. Scheduled to enter commercial service before the
end of the year, they burn 16 percent less fuel than today’s best jet
engines, Pratt says. They pollute less. They have fewer parts, which
increases reliability. And they create up to 75 percent less noise on
the ground, enabling carriers to pay lower noise fees and travel over
some residential areas that are no-fly zones for regular planes. Airbus,
Bombardier, Embraer, Irkut, and Mitsubishi have certified the engines
for use on their narrowbody craft. JetBlue, Lufthansa, Air New Zealand,
Malaysia’s Flymojo, and Japan Airlines are among the engine’s 70 buyers
in more than 30 countries.
To people outside the aircraft
business, what may be most remarkable about the engines is that they
took almost 30 years to develop. That’s about 15 times as long as the
gestation period of an elephant and unimaginably longer than it takes to
pop out a smartphone app. Could Pratt have gotten the hardware out
faster? Probably. But industrial innovation on the scale of a commercial
jet engine is inevitably and invariably a slog—one part inspiration to
99 parts perspiration.
In Pratt’s case, it required the
cooperation of hundreds of engineers across the company, a $10 billion
investment commitment from management, and, above all, the buy-in of
aircraft makers and airlines, which had to be convinced that the engine
would be both safe and durable. “It’s the antithesis of a Silicon Valley
innovation,” says Alan Epstein, a retired MIT professor who is the
company’s vice president for technology and the environment. “The
Silicon Valley guys seem to have the attention span of 3-year-olds.”
No comments:
Post a Comment